Powered by WordPress | Theme by mg12 | Remixed by Stanus
  • Dream Teams

    I found a great debate article on ESPN dealing with putting together the best team of all time.

    Early this morning, a debate broke out among the SportsCenter staff in the show pod. The question was, “If you had to choose 5 players to start on an all-time NBA team, who would it be?” After about 15 minutes, we decided to do a draft. Four teams, and each picked a starting 5. The Team names are based on the order of the draft (Team A had the 1st pick, but in this “snake-style draft”, team A did not select again until pick number 8). For the record, Michel Jordan did NOT go with the first pick – here’s how the 1st round went: 1) Chamberlain, 2) Jordan, 3) Magic, 4) LeBron.

    Well, this is right up my alley, so I had to put my own 2 cents into the argument. I went with each player’s highest APP+ value and then found which team had the highest average. Of course, I’d love to do a 10k sim (simulate the games 10,000 times), but I don’t have a system to do that … yet! Here’s the breakdown:

    Dream Team Pos Player Best Year/Team APP+
    Team A C Wilt Chamberlain (1) 1963 SFW 34.69
    PF Tim Duncan 2002 SAS 29.19
    SF Oscar Robertson 1964 CIN 27.97
    SG Jerry West 1970 LAL 19.41
    PG John Stockton 1991 UTA 21.86
    Average APP+ 26.62

    Chamberlain and Duncan would create perhaps the most fearsome offensive-defensive low post punch, but Oscar Robertson as a small forward? I wonder how effective he would be off the ball. Team A would lose size with Jerry West at the shooting guard position but Chamberlain’s production seems to more than make up for everyone else’s lapses.

    Dream Team Pos Player Best Year/Team APP+
    Team B C Bill Russell 1965 BOS 24.47
    PF Charles Barkley 1987 PHI 25.41
    SF Elgin Baylor 1961 LAL 25.57
    SG Michael Jordan (2) 1989 CHI 29.59
    PG Pete Maravich 1977 NOJ 13.57
    Average APP+ 23.72

    Obviously this team won’t be lacking in terms of scoring with Barkley, Baylor, Maravich and especially Jordan. Also, they’re anchored by the winningest baller in the history of the sport. However, I’m concerned about ESPN’s selection of Pistol Pete. Sure, he was an electrifying player in both the NBA and college as well as a deeply interesting man, but he’s one of the league’s most famously overrated guys. As a result, Team B is dragged down a bit in terms of average APP+.

    Dream Team Pos Player Best Year/Team APP+
    Team C C Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1972 MIN 29.81
    PF Hakeem Olajuwon 1993 HOU 26.71
    SF Larry Bird 1987 BOS 26.79
    SG Julius Erving 1975 NYA 20.46
    PG Magic Johnson (3) 1989 LAL 26.19
    Average APP+ 25.99

    This is my favorite team. How can you beat these five in their prime? Still, I’m not so sure how Hakeem at the four would work. I would probably switch Kareem with him as Kareem was more of the finesse player while Hakeem was the better defender. Julius would be a big shooting guard, but at this early a stage in his career, he’s probably quick enough to keep up with even Jordan. With Hakeem and Kareem in the low post, Julius slashing, Bird shotting and Magic dishing, this is a solid, solid team.

    Dream Team Pos Player Best Year/Team APP+
    Team D C Shaquille O’Neal 2000 LAL 28.06
    PF Kevin Garnett 2004 MIN 29.03
    SF LeBron James (4) 2009 CLE 28.12
    SG Kobe Bryant 2003 LAL 21.21
    PG Isiah Thomas 1985 DET 19.41
    Average APP+ 25.17

    Though comprised of unquestionably great players, I have the msot reservations about this team playing together. Look at who is playing each position … and then realize there’s only one ball to share between them!

    Anyway, the APP+ has spoken and predicts Team A to be the winner. However, I’d still love to 10k sim this because I get the feeling Team C might edge everyone out.

    Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010 at 14:41
No comments yet.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
TOP